<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nominalism and the Church with Ockham, Luther, and Hobbes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://taylormarshall.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/nominalism-and-the-church-with-ockham-luther-and-hobbes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://taylormarshall.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/nominalism-and-the-church-with-ockham-luther-and-hobbes/</link>
	<description>by Taylor Marshall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:49:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hazel</title>
		<link>http://taylormarshall.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/nominalism-and-the-church-with-ockham-luther-and-hobbes/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>hazel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylormarshall.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/nominalism-and-the-church-with-ockham-luther-and-hobbes/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>this is sooo rubbish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is sooo rubbish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://taylormarshall.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/nominalism-and-the-church-with-ockham-luther-and-hobbes/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylormarshall.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/nominalism-and-the-church-with-ockham-luther-and-hobbes/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Wow ... good job. I have been thinking this also as I study for my systematic theology comps at Regent College.
I am arguing the same! The realist approach bolsters clerical authority.
I believe that the nominal approach, unintentionally, creates a slippery slope which renders doctrine obsolete. Instead, the only thing needed in Church is &#039;truth&#039; (Kung), however truth devoid from universals seems very shaky!
Further: How can the Church guard against heresy if it has no authority?

Luther would roll in his grave if he could see what a living breathing reformation has evolved to.
Erasmus was right when he feared everyone would end up claiming to be &quot;pope&quot;, if Luther had his way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8230; good job. I have been thinking this also as I study for my systematic theology comps at Regent College.<br />
I am arguing the same! The realist approach bolsters clerical authority.<br />
I believe that the nominal approach, unintentionally, creates a slippery slope which renders doctrine obsolete. Instead, the only thing needed in Church is &#8216;truth&#8217; (Kung), however truth devoid from universals seems very shaky!<br />
Further: How can the Church guard against heresy if it has no authority?</p>
<p>Luther would roll in his grave if he could see what a living breathing reformation has evolved to.<br />
Erasmus was right when he feared everyone would end up claiming to be &#8220;pope&#8221;, if Luther had his way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://taylormarshall.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/nominalism-and-the-church-with-ockham-luther-and-hobbes/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylormarshall.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/nominalism-and-the-church-with-ockham-luther-and-hobbes/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Amen! Read Bouyer&#039;s &quot;The Spirit and Forms of Protestantism&quot; for an excellent analysis of how nominalism poisons our faith.

I have also been interested in nominalism and have written about it. If you&#039;re interested, check out my blog. 

Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen! Read Bouyer&#8217;s &#8220;The Spirit and Forms of Protestantism&#8221; for an excellent analysis of how nominalism poisons our faith.</p>
<p>I have also been interested in nominalism and have written about it. If you&#8217;re interested, check out my blog. </p>
<p>Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
